Head-to-head comparison · Portable Power Stations
BLUETTI AC70 vs EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro
Both hold 768 Wh in LiFePO4 cells with a 5-year warranty. The AC70 has more output, more solar input and a second USB-C port; the RIVER 2 Pro is 4.3 lb lighter.
By Watt Versus Editorial· Updated
This page was drafted with AI assistance from manufacturers' specs and manuals, and is checked by our editor.
Why the BLUETTI AC70 Portable Power Station wins
The AC70 gives 1,000 W against 800 W, accepts 500 W of solar against 220 W, has two 100 W USB-C ports and switches over in 20 ms against under 30 ms. Buy the RIVER 2 Pro if you carry it often: 18.2 lb against 22.5 lb.
Prices change often. Check the current price and availability on Amazon.
Check Latest Price on Amazon (paid link)
BLUETTI AC70 Portable Power Station
A 768 Wh LiFePO4 station with 1,000 W of AC output, 500 W of solar input, two 100 W USB-C ports and a 20 ms UPS switchover.
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro Portable Power Station
A compact 768 Wh LiFePO4 station that weighs about 18 lb and recharges fully in 70 minutes.
Side-by-side
Specs compared
| Specification | BLUETTI AC70 Portable Power StationOur pick | EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro Portable Power Station |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | Editorial score:8.1/10 | Editorial score:7.8/10 |
| Best for | Best 768 Wh for Solar | — |
| Capacity | 768 Wh | 768 Wh |
| Battery chemistry | LiFePO4 (LFP) | LiFePO4 (LFP) |
| Rated cycle life | 3,000+ cycles to 80% capacity | 3,000 cycles to 80%+ capacity |
| AC output | 1,000 W (2,000 W power lifting for resistive loads) | 800 W |
| AC outlets | 2 | — |
| USB-C output | 2 x 100 W | 1 x 100 W |
| Wall recharge | 0-80% in 45 minutes in turbo mode; 950 W max AC input | 0-100% in 70 minutes (940 W input) |
| Max solar input | 500 W | 220 W |
| Expandable to | 1,574 Wh with a B80 battery (AC70 + B80 kit) | — |
| Backup switchover | 20 ms | Under 30 ms |
| Weight | 22.5 lb | 18.2 lb |
| Dimensions | 12.4 x 8.2 x 10.1 in | 10.6 x 10.2 x 8.9 in |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
| Peak output | — | 1,600 W surge |
| Where to buy | Check Latest Price on Amazon (paid link) | Check Latest Price on Amazon (paid link) |
Scroll sideways to see both columns →
At a glance
Key differences
- 1AC output: 1,000 W for the AC70, 800 W for the RIVER 2 Pro
- 2Solar input: 500 W against 220 W
- 3USB-C: 2 x 100 W against 1 x 100 W
- 4UPS switchover: 20 ms against under 30 ms
- 5Weight: 22.5 lb against 18.2 lb
Product by product
Pros and cons
BLUETTI AC70 Portable Power Station
The mid-size pick for solar charging and USB-C devices. If weight matters more than solar input, the RIVER 2 Pro is lighter.
Pros
- 500 W of solar input, more than double the RIVER 2 Pro's 220 W
- 1,000 W of AC output with a 2,000 W power-lifting mode for kettles and hair dryers
- Two 100 W USB-C ports
- LiFePO4 cells rated for 3,000+ cycles, backed by a 5-year warranty
Cons
- Only two AC outlets
- 22.5 lb, heavier than the 18.2 lb EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro
- Power lifting runs resistive heaters at reduced power; it is not a true 2,000 W output
- BLUETTI's pages give different surge figures, so we leave surge out
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro Portable Power Station
A good weekend-camping station when weight matters more than output. Its 800 W inverter is the limit to check against what you plan to plug in.
Pros
- Full recharge in 70 minutes, by EcoFlow's figures
- About 18 lb with 768 Wh on board, easy to carry in one hand
- LiFePO4 cells rated for 3,000 cycles, with a 5-year warranty
- Automatic backup switchover in under 30 ms
Cons
- 800 W of AC output rules out most kettles, microwaves and space heaters at full power
- Solar input is limited to 220 W, so a full solar recharge takes several hours
- USB-A ports are limited to 12 W each
Choose the BLUETTI AC70 if
- You recharge from solar panels.
- You run appliances near 1,000 W or kettles in power-lifting mode.
Choose the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro if
- Weight matters most, for example for hiking to a campsite.
- 800 W covers everything you plan to run.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more power, the AC70 or the RIVER 2 Pro?
- The AC70: 1,000 W of AC output against 800 W, plus a 2,000 W power-lifting mode for resistive heaters.
- Which is better for solar?
- The AC70 accepts 500 W of solar input against 220 W for the RIVER 2 Pro, so it refills much faster from panels.
- Which is lighter?
- The RIVER 2 Pro, at 18.2 lb against 22.5 lb.
Sources
The specifications and claims on this page come from these manufacturer documents. Figures are the manufacturers' own unless the text says otherwise.
More comparisons
VS comparison
EcoFlow DELTA 3 Classic Portable Power Station vs EcoFlow DELTA 3 Plus Portable Power Station
Same 1,024 Wh capacity, 1,800 W output and 3,600 W surge. The Plus adds double the solar input, faster USB-C, a cycle rating and expansion; the Classic recharges to 80% faster and weighs a pound less.
Updated October 22, 2026
VS comparison
EcoFlow DELTA 3 Plus Portable Power Station vs Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 Portable Power Station
Both store about 1 kWh in LFP cells rated for 4,000 cycles. The Anker puts out more power and charges faster from the wall; the EcoFlow takes twice the solar and can grow to 5 kWh.
Updated October 15, 2026
VS comparison
EcoFlow DELTA 3 Plus Portable Power Station vs EcoFlow DELTA 2 Portable Power Station
Same capacity, same 1,800 W of AC output. The DELTA 3 Plus is the newer design, with longer-rated cells, double the solar input and faster USB-C.
Updated October 15, 2026